428
28 Bioconversion of Food Waste to Wealth – Circular Bioeconomy Approach
Emergency measures
Application of anti-foam
additives
Avoidance of foam supporting
feeding substrates
Resolving process upsets
Change of pysico-chemical
conditions
Change of mixing and feeding
strategy
Technical measures
Lowering of the filling level
Commercial anti-foam products
Vegetable oil or biodiesel
Buffering additives
Reduction of foam supporting substrates
Feeding of these substrates into the post-digester
Change of feeding intervals
Application of trace elements if necessary
Avoidance of inhibitors, re-inoculation after toxification
Reduction of feeding after overfeeding
Change of the viscosity
Controlled change of temperature
Change of alkalinity
Shortening of pauses between mixing intervals
Shortening of pauses between feeding intervals
Variation of mixer speed and/or direction
Installation of fan nozzles
Installation of an overflow pipe at filling level height
Installation of a mixer at filling level height
Reduction of feeding
Adjustment of stirrers to the top level
Figure 28.2
Strategies applied to reduce the foaming in 327 biogas plants . Source:
Lindorfer and Demmig [26].
agents by microorganisms due to improper digester operations; and (iii) high loading
of organic dry matter [25, 26]. Unexpected decrease in pH and increase in tempera-
ture can also cause foaming due to sudden release of large volume of dissolved CO2
gas [27]. Foaming problems in digesters can be avoided by (Figure 28.2) control-
ling the loading rate of foam generating substrates, changing the physicochemical
conditions, and application of anti-foaming agents.
Agro- and food processing wastes are grouped into seven categories based on
chemical characteristics including energy crops, byproducts of lignocellulosic,
herbaceous, vegetable and fruit crops, livestock effluents, and miscellaneous food
processing byproducts [13]. Energy crops such as millet, barley, sorghum, maize,
and triticale are justified by high methane yields (250–350 l CH4/kg total volatile
solids) due to high hydrolysis constant rates (0.15 d−1) which indicate the good
degradation potential. Food wastes are the most abundant waste in urban area and
are characterized by their methane yield (250–350 l CH4/kg total volatile solids) [13].
This will overcome the disadvantage of mono-digestion of food waste by increased